Norsk

Results of the second Ice Shelf–Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (ISOMIP+)

The Cryosphere ()

https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2053-2026

Research article

Open access (unknown)

licensed under CC BY

1 Akvaplan-niva (current employee)

1 Akvaplan-niva (prior employee)

Authors (28)
  1. Claire K. Yung
  2. Xylar S. Asay-Davis
  3. Alistair Adcroft
  4. Christopher Y. S. Bull
  5. Jan De Rydt
  6. Michael S. Dinniman
  7. Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi
  8. Daniel Goldberg
  9. David E. Gwyther
  10. Robert Hallberg
  11. Matthew Harrison
  12. Tore Hattermann
  13. David M. Holland
  14. Denise Holland
  15. Paul R. Holland
  16. James R. Jordan
  17. Nicolas C. Jourdain
  18. Kazuya Kusahara
  19. Gustavo Marques
  20. Pierre Mathiot
  21. Dimitris Menemenlis
  22. Adele K. Morrison
  23. Yoshihiro Nakayama
  24. Olga Sergienko
  25. Robin S. Smith
  26. Alon Stern
  27. Ralph Timmermann
  28. Qin Zhou

Abstract

Ocean-driven basal melting of Antarctic ice shelves plays an important role in the mass loss of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Ice shelf cavity-resolving ocean models are a valuable tool for understanding ice shelf-ocean interactions and for simulating projections of ice shelf and ocean states under future climate. Designed to assess the current state of ice shelf–ocean modelling, the second Ice Shelf–Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, ISOMIP+, consists of 12 ocean model configurations submitted with a common, idealised experimental setup. Here, we focus on the experiments Ocean0–2 (Asay-Davis et al., 2016), which are ocean models with idealised, static ice shelf geometries, but where the ocean reaches a balance with prescribed far-field ocean conditions. Different thermal transfer coefficient values (ranging from 0.011 to 0.2) are used for each model in the melting parameterisation to achieve a common, tuned melt rate since the models cover a range of types of vertical coordinates, ice–ocean boundary layer treatments, and numerical schemes. These model differences lead to spread in the resultant ocean properties, circulation, boundary-layer structure and spatial distribution of melting. We also highlight similarities between models, such as a shared linear relationship across most models between melt rate and overturning and barotropic streamfunctions during the spin-up and spin-down, demonstrating a robust relationship between melt and circulation across models and forcing conditions. The ISOMIP+ results provide a systematic comparison of ice shelf cavity-capable ocean models. However, we also demonstrate the need for realistic ice shelf–ocean model intercomparison projects (some already underway) to assess model biases and inter-model variation against sparse observations. Further research is needed to understand the differences between models and further improve our modelled representations of the ice–ocean boundary layer and ice shelf cavity circulation.

Projects
  • Ocean-ice shelf Interaction and channelized Melting in Dronning Maud Land
  • iC3: Centre for Ice, Cryosphere, Carbon and Climate
  • From Climatic Drivers to Antarctic Ice Sheet Response: Improving Accuracy in Sea Level Rise Projections
  • Created , modified